And, you didn’t even mention probably the two oldest (one defunct) grand-daddies, Sourceforge and Freshmeat (Those were the days when they were really the only two choices). So, what really is the difference between the various cloud repositories?Īctually, if you are only interested in a convenient, cloud-based repository with version control, all that you listed do that. It seems that Bitbucket supports git although I’ve never accessed a Bitbucket repo that way… I’ve only ever used Mercurial (Hg). So the question is: should loook at gitkranken or stay with GIT, Github and BitucektĪnd leave gitkraken as a tiny commeercial project that is not worth looking atĪnd leave gitkraken as a tiny commeercial project that is not worth looking at**īitbucket has been around for a long time. GitKraken connects to all 3 to clone/add repos, create/view PRs & more. Gitkraken is told to be a commercial project that only wants to make mone.yīut technically spoken gitkraken has some interesting features. The question is: Which Git GUI should I use with GitHub, Bitbucket or GitLab? A friend of me told me that i should run (use) GitKraken There are prolly several other minor differences that one might realize once you use both of them.
So, these are some of the major differences. That would be great.įirst of all: - afaik i can use Bitbucket with GIT - is this true? Is this true: Can i run git on both systems GitHub and bitbucket. Well - i have heard that we can use git with (on) Github and bitbucket. In fact both them can be called “Distributed Version control system-tolls”, While git and mercrurial can be called true vanilla version controlling ‘tools’ which can be used for the creation, management and version controlling of git/hg repositories, Git and mercurial(hg) - both are the actual tools for version controll. What are main differences between Git, GitHub and Bitbucket resp Gitkraken? And also Git and Mercurial
0 kommentar(er)
